Hsc Mod C Julius Caesar free essay sample

Arrangers of writings present a one-sided disposition to the occasions, characters or circumstances spoke to. In different messages, for example, Shakespeare’s â€Å"Julius Caesar† and Leunig’s animation â€Å"Yet another image with an inappropriate caption†, the authors predisposition is clear despite the fact that clashing points of view towards the character are introduced. Albeit clashing points of view are available in Shakespeare’s â€Å"Julius Caesar†, the authors predisposition is as yet clear. Shakespeare’s â€Å"Julius Caesar† is a play which mirrored the tension of England over progression of leadership.When the play was written in 1599, serious oversight won and Shakespeare picked Caesar’s story so as to pass on critical thoughts and messages to the Elizabethan crowd about the significance of solid administration. Shakespeare’s one-sided demeanor is obvious over the span of the play â€Å"Julius Caesar† as viewpoints of Caesar varies enormously. The portrayal of numerous clashing points of view in â€Å"Julius Caesar† doesn't guarantee that the content stays fair-minded in its depiction of characters. Clashing points of view are utilized in â€Å"Julius Caesar† to construct sensational strain, inside the gathering of backstabbers just as the individuals who restrict them. In the first place, Shakespeare controls us to take on the conspirators’ perspective on Caesar as an egomaniac tyrant whom is merciless, tricky and generally grievous. This view is delineated in Act I Scene II of the play whereby Flavius and Murellus are slaughtered for separating festivities on Caesar turning out to be above all else â€Å"Murellus and Flavius, for pulling scarves of Caesars pictures, are put to quietness. Passage you well†.Caesars presumption and pretentious nature can be seen through his language which is absolutist and basic all through the play â€Å"For consistently I am Caesar†. Shakespeare portrays Caesar in an unflattering light to a limited degree to emphasize the significance of solid authority to the Elizabethan crowd. Shakespeare’s inclination is additionally introduced in the play â€Å"Julius Caesar† as he shape us to esteem Caesar, and we later see him as an effective and meriting pioneer. This is appeared after the death, as Caesar stays supreme all through the remainder of the play whereby Brutus sees his apparition on a few occasions.This thought is additionally uplifted as both Cassius and Brutus pass on with their final words being worried about Caesar â€Å"Caesar, thou workmanship revenged†. Thusly, this further delineates the authors one-sided disposition is obvious in the play â€Å"Julius Caesar† as we are given various discernments on the one character. Along these lines it is clear that despite the fact that alternate points of view towards the character are showed, Shakespeare’s inclination is as yet o bvious. In the play â€Å"Julius Caesar† people are driven by various desire and inspirations including those of opportunity, optimism and respect. Both Brutus and Cassius see the requirement for Caesar’s passing however are driven by various inspirations and viewpoints on the political circumstance at that point. Cassius detests Caesar and his disdain towards him is caused to some extent for the force given to somebody he sees as his physical and scholarly second rate, which is appeared through powerful non-serious inquiries â€Å"Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed/That he has become so incredible? † His contempt is trigged by his own absence of accomplishment irritated by recognitions that a man so truly weak ought to â€Å"bear the palm alone†.Cassius disdain towards Caesar and his view of him being a Tyrant is additionally uplifted using visual symbolism â€Å" he doth straddle the restricted world/Like a Colossus, and we trivial men/Walk under his gigantic legs and peep about/To get ourselves disreputable graves†. In contrast to Cassius, Brutus is a decent, self â€righteous and respectab le man whose inspiration for Caesars demise is driven for the love of Rome just as his anxiety that Rome would turn into an autocracy controlled by a solitary defiled individual, instead of the perniciousness, avarice and jealousy that Cassius conveys. Brutus’s inspirations driving the passing of Caesar is plainly obvious in his discourse after the death. All through his discourse, Brutus depends on reason and legitimate justification and arguments to clarify the purposes for the death â€Å"If then that companion request why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I adored Caesar less, however that I cherished Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living, and bite the dust all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all liberated individual? /as he was driven, I slew him†. These solid and emotive words show Brutus solid love for Rome.Thus it tends to be said that, despite the fact that Shakespeare presents different observations towards Julius Caesar, the composer’s inclination isn't refuted. In contrast with the recognitions both Cassius and Brutus have towards Caesar, is simply the points of view of Antony and Caesar of himself. Antony took a gander at Caesar as a companion, a good exampl e just as a sort and meriting pioneer. This idea is exemplified using emotive language â€Å"O powerful Caesar! /most respectable blood of this world/the noblest man/That at any point lived in the tide of times†.Furthermore, the utilization of illustrative and demonstrative language all through Antony’s burial service tribute, for example, â€Å"sweet Caesar† paints Caesar as a casualty to a horrifying and colossal wrongdoing. His nauseate and pity towards the backstabbers is additionally obviously outlined all through the tribute. He portrays the plotters as â€Å"butchers† and, again in a monologue, cries â€Å"havoc and let slip the pooches of war†, which emphasizes Antony’s profound detesting of the backstabbers activities towards Caesar. Then again, Caesar sees himself as invulnerable just as a terrific and certain leader.Self elevating symbolism which identifies with steadiness, â€Å"But I am as consistent as the northern star† just as Godlike, momentous force, †Å"Hence! Wither thou lift up Olympus? † embodies his consistent and firm nature of being a ruler. His certainty of being an effective pioneer which has been stirred by his economic wellbeing is elevated all through the basic words â€Å"For consistently I am Caesar†. This along these lines outlines the numerous observations introduced to the one character in the play â€Å"Julius Caesar†.Hence it is clear, that the content â€Å"Julius Caesar† stays one-sided despite the fact that there are clashing points of view introduced. Leunig’s cynical animation â€Å"Yet another image with an inappropriate caption† is another case of clashing points of view. The animation is as a paper report in which stunning realities and measurements about the conditions in the war in Iraq are simply underneath the picture wherein John Howard and George Bush are inclining forward, grinning and shaking hands before a perfect fireplace.There are two extremely clear viewpoints being introduced about the alliances in the animation. The main point of view being their own perspectives on themselves. Concerning the war in Iraq, both John Howard and George Bush accept they are making an extraordinary showing. This view is roused as the alliances look confident through their conceited articulations. Additionally, the alliances are excessively satisfied with themselves and take a gander at each other as effective and honorable. In contrast with JuliusCaesar, the Conspirators accepted that by executing Caesar, they would do Rome and the individuals of Rome some help. They emphatically trusted it was the best activity, and in the event that they didn't act in such a manner, at that point Rome would have been constrained by a despot. This idea can be connected to Leunig’s animation â€Å"Yet another image with an inappropriate caption† as just in the alliances feeling that Sadam Hussein is a despot and in this way should likewise be murdered. The news reporter’s own sentiment on the alliances in Leunig’s animation â€Å"Yet another image with an inappropriate caption† is additionally apparent.This see is inspired through real data, measurements which are give n, master assessment present of the stunning truth of the war in Iraq â€Å"Increasing quantities of kids in Iraq need more food to eat, and in excess of a quarter are constantly undernourished, an UN report says†. In contrast with Shakespeare’s â€Å"Julius Caesar†, the individuals of Rome conflict with the backstabbers and can't help contradicting the murdering of their pioneer. The expulsion of Caesar as a lord and pioneer prompts common hardship, disorder and in the long run a war.The author Leunig has spoken to the characters in a negative light in the animation â€Å"Yet another image with an inappropriate caption†. His point is to caricaturize the alliance and feature their noxiousness and significant numbness. Eventually, there are numerous writings which depicts clashing viewpoints. These writings incorporate Shakespeare’s play â€Å"Julius Caesar† just as Leunig’s harsh animation â€Å"Yet another image with an inappropriate caption†. Subsequently is can be presumed that albeit clashing points of view towards the character are spoken to the composers’ predisposition is as yet apparent in different writings.

Persuasive Speech About Global Warming Essay Example

Convincing Speech About Global Warming Paper A dangerous atmospheric devation Persuasive Speech Gas is a dreary, unscented gas that is available in the environment and is shaped when any fuel containing carbon is scorched. Plants and trees are utilizing it during the time spent photosynthesis. Carbon dioxide is additionally utilized in refrigeration, fire quenchers, and carbonated beverages. As it were this is the gas we have to battle with! By utilizing non-renewable energy sources in nearly all that we do, we make a colossal haze of gas and this is heating up the world. By doing this, we cause genuine harm to the nature and we may irreversibly affect it and what's to come. As you presently comprehend that we have to battle with it, I am going to disclose to you a few different ways to do it. Above all else, diminish the time you are in the vehicle and utilize your legs to move . See Bikes! Individuals are getting lazier as time goes, however you can roll out the improvement. On the off chance that you walk more, you help your planet and you help yourself, so why not to do it? Take care about your nursery. Those are the channels of our caused elevated levels of gas. The unstoppable force of life realizes how to fix the world, so lets help a tad. Did you realize that at regular intervals a football field of timberland is gone on the planet? We will compose a custom paper test on Persuasive Speech About Global Warming explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom article test on Persuasive Speech About Global Warming explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom paper test on Persuasive Speech About Global Warming explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer It takes minutes to annihilate it, yet hundreds of years to get it back. Make your little nursery, plant a tree, help your grandma at the nursery, clean backwoods Energy sparing. That is the way to spare this planet. The greater part of CO is created utilizing non-renewable energy sources all over. Vehicles, manufacturing plants, agribusiness, and so forth. Be that as it may, we have a few different ways to battle with it. Dont utilize old vehicles which leaves a cloud in the wake of firing up. Utilize new , financial and little motors to decrease the discharges. Or on the other hand far and away superior, utilize a BIKE. Utilize power from sustainable sources like breeze , waves, waterways, sun based vitality and so forth.

More at Home

More at Home Thanks to a continuation of computer problems, I was without a computer for the entire month of January. Thus, when Chris made a call for more blog posts during IAP, I said Id get around to it once I returned from my five-week expedition to India. Fine; even though IAP is ancient history, I will deliver. As one might be able to deduce from my previous adventures, I feel more at home overseas and traveling abroad than at home. This trip to India, which had no connection to Hamsikas, was a follow-up to a course I took last term called 4.S10 â€" Delhi and Jaisalmer: An Architectural Journey through Two Indian Cities. It wasnt a particularly heavy course â€" just six units, P/D/F grading, a semi-freshman seminar (even though most of the people in the course were upperclassmen). There was no doubt the IAP trip was a major draw for students, but I am also very much interested in Indian architecture â€" specifically the Mughal architecture the country is most famous for â€" and so registering for 4S.10 was a no-brainer. Now, let me warn you that, although this post is a summary, it is far from brief. But there are pictures! Week One During the last week of December â€" and 2010 â€" I was briefly back in the UK, now my second home, where I reminisced about my prior year there (where I did the Cambridge-MIT Exchange). Having exhausted the London tourist trail over the summer, when I interned in the city, I simply revisited the street where I lived and took in some of the Christmas decorations (the Trafalgar tree was remarkably unspectacular). I stayed with a gracious friend in the East End (with whom I proved how poorly I play Call of Duty) and then went up to Cambridge for more trips down Memory Lane. But the crowning moment of Week 1 (technically not during IAP) was the chance to celebrate New Years Eve in London. Even though my friends and I arrived relatively late to the Thames, we still scored a riverside spot for the stroke of midnight (after three hours standing in the chilly nighttime air). Following the fireworks, we stayed up the remainder of the night playing backgammon, eating kebabs, and going to a shisha café (see a theme?). My flight was at 8am on New Years Day, so I hardly had a choice here: I had to stay up all night. After transiting through Dohas abominable airport, I finally arrived in India January 2 in the early â€" very early â€" morning, at 3:30am. I was back in Bangalore, where I worked during the summer of 2009. Despite the early hour, I still managed to recall how to navigate to the home of a friend whom I worked with during my internship (+ one benefit in meeting people abroad). The weather was a welcome change from the Boston cold and London fog; the temperature in Bangalore was in the neighborhood of 80F and, for the first time in days, I could see blue sky. The traffic was a lot more chaotic in India (as expected), but I guess you cant have everything. And, to be honest, Im a big fan of chaos. Week Two Departing Bangalore, I slowly made my way up north to Delhi, where I was supposed to meet the remaining MIT students on January 6. On the way, I stopped in Bijapur, sometimes known as the Agra of the South. Not receiving as many foreign visitors as the real Agra, it seemed everyone wanted to talk with me and be photographed. The next stop was Mumbai, where I spent several hours walking around its Londonesque southern tip (as I had done sixteen months earlier). For a number of reasons (did you know it takes over an hour to go 15 km in Mumbai?), I missed my train departing to Jhansi. Luckily (not sure if thats the right word to use), there was a taxi driver willing to drive me the 130 km to the next station at the meager price of Rs 2500 ($55). Because the deal was that I only paid if I made the train, he drove in a manner that may have even been unacceptably aggressive by Indian standards. Trust me; thats saying a lot. To add to my travel troubles, the train was five hours late arriving in Jhansi; we actually sat about ten kilometers from the station for around ninety minutes. The late arrival seriously cut short my time in the city (or, rather, nearby Orchha), but it was certainly among the most memorable parts of the entire month, as I met a number of people on the train and joined passengers in building (unappealing) trash fires outside the train. (Between Mumbai and Jhansi, we went from 80F to 40F.) And this foreshadowed the extended final leg to Delhi: whereas I was supposed to have a four-hour train ride leaving around 6pm, I had a twelve-hour train ride leaving closer to 10:30pm. The culprit? Fog apparently. Finally united with my MIT comrades in Delhi, the official part of the trip kicked off with visits to several business schools owned by MIT alumnus Vinay Rai, including Rai Business School. Several students from these schools, especially RBS, showed us around the city the first few days and even accompanied us throughout much of the remainder of the month. On January 8, all of us, plus several students from the University of Virginia, made the journey down to Agra to see the Taj Mahal (no trip to India is complete without it). Week Three Week Three was almost exclusively consumed by Project Prakash, a project spearheaded by MIT Professor Pawan Sinha. In a few words, Professor Sinhas work focuses on addressing congenital blindness in India; eventually hed like to build a facility in India that would help reintegrate formerly blind people back into society. However, our group of fourteen MIT students broadened the scope of his project to research all childhood disabilities in India. We split into four teams (mine was looking at medical concerns) and travelled across Delhi, speaking to doctors, NGOs, shopkeepers, and everyday citizens (in between more sightseeing, of course). Toward the end of the project, we visited a charity eye clinic set up in a slum in northern Delhi. As part of that days program, we walked through (I hesitate to say toured) one of the slums in the area. Many of us, suffice it to say, were very surprised to see how happy and excited many of the people, especially the children, were to see us. Rather than making us feel like intruders (which, in a way, we were), children were following us, talking to us, jostling for the opportunity to be photographed, and finally wishing us a resounding goodbye when we eventually pulled away in our bus. That day â€" January 16 â€" truly encapsulated one of the great parts of doing Project Prakash: it enabled us to explore aspects of India one normally wouldnt be able to explore as a typical tourist. Week Four After a week of work in Delhi, we headed into Rajasthan, considered one of the â€" if not the â€" most beautiful state in India. We only had eight days to travel around the state, but we managed to cover a great deal of territory. The first stop was Jaipur, Rajasthans capital and largest city. We got the chance to see the making of a few handicrafts, and the following day, we visited Amer Fort (just outside Jaipur), riding elephants from the side of the road up to its entrance. After visiting Amer Fort, easily the most impressive site on our circuit, we stopped at Jaipurs City Palace and explored the citys markets. The next day, we made our way to Udaipur, breaking up the eight-hour journey with stops at Pushkar (known among Hindus for its Brahma temple, one of very few in existence) and Ajmer (known for hosting the tomb of one of Sufisms most revered figures). Udaipur itself was, like the iPad, simply magical. Sometimes called the Venice of the East, the city is built around several man-made lakes, including one claimed to be among the most picturesque in the world (and Im inclined to agree). After one day in Udaipur, we proceeded to Jodhpur, stopping in Ranakpur to see its grand Jain temple. That meant we had visited places of worship for five or six religions (after Jainism, Sikhism, Islam, Hinduism, the Bahai Faith, and the Hare Krishna Movement). In Jodphur, unfortunately, we only had time to see its Mehrangarh Fort before we had to continue to our final destination in Rajasthan: Jaisalmer. Week Five Although India has many forts, Jaisalmers is the only one that is still a working fort. On first night there, we ate at a rather disgusting restaurant where everything on the menu was misspelled and the kitchen was a mess. However, the following night, we found something a bit more appetizing to do (okay, we didnt find it, so much as it was just scheduled): that evening, we made an excursion west of the city for a short camel journey and view of the sunset over the desert sand. (Note that I did my level best to locate a photo of all of us, but because there was almost always someone sick at any given point during our four weeks in India, such a photo may not actually exist. Pictured are Becca 11, Emma 11, Iris 14, Shan 11, Saul 14, Me 11 [back], Ami 14, Noa 14, Emily 11, Leah 11, Eliana 12, Patrick 11, Yael 13 [front]; not pictured is Rai 11.) Our Indian adventure didnt officially end for another four days, but the remainder of the trip was primarily consumed by working on reports for Project Prakash, getting in some last-minute shopping, and preparing to leave. My return to America was longer than most peoples (even longer than the two whose direct flight to Newark turned into a twenty-four hour layover in Shanghai). I built in a six-hour layover in Doha â€" plenty of time to see the city considering its limited points of interest and the close proximity of the airport to Dohas Corniche. My goal for the day was to stop by the Museum of Islamic Art, whose building is as much a work of art as the pieces in its galleries. I.M. Pei, who graduated from MIT in 1940, designed the building in the mid-2000s â€" at the age of 90. Ninety, folks. After leaving Doha, I made the obligatory return to London â€" somewhat of a forced two-day layover to break up my sets of flights. While much sunnier in London than on my outward journey, I was much less productive this round, spending what seemed like half of it queuing in the immigration line at Heathrow. I did, however, manage to squeeze in time to go see a(nother) friend in London, watching our Boston Celtics crush the Lakers that Sunday night. While not widely advertised, you are not compelled to be present at MIT during the day on Registration Day. So, I squeezed every little bit out of my IAP by not returning to Boston (via Zurich) until 8pm that night. I got a somewhat stern e-mail from my advisers assistant the day after wondering why I hadnt registered on Monday, but that paled in comparison to the pointed line of questioning I received upon arriving at Logan Airport (ah, the secondary screening). I was explicitly questioned about how and why I traveled so much at a young age, what my room number was at MIT, and where my family and friends lived. Like I said, more at home overseas.